• phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Wikipedia’s TOS bans this kind of activity, and it’s pretty effective at detecting it. This has been going on elsewhere for over a decade, and I know of at least one reputation-laundering firm that has gone bust because of Wikipedia reverting everything they tried to plant.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It bans some versions of this, but it can’t ban all of it. The obvious way is fully banned and hard to get away with: pay someone to delete unflattering things about you on Wikipedia. But, you can do a much more costly, slower, but much more likely to be acceptable version: you can buy a newspaper and arrange for that newspaper to write flattering articles about you. Since those articles qualify as a primary source, you can then have someone update Wikipedia to include things from that article using the article as a primary source. That doesn’t delete the unflattering things, but it pushes them down the page and surrounds them by flattering things. If you’re a billionaire, you’ll find a way to get the articles edited in a way that is permitted by the Wikipedia rules.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t know about how they’re good at detecting it.

      Look up at the story of David Woodward spamming his own bio on all Wikipedia languages.