• FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    The owner chooses what to share in response to a request. Just like IRL when the police knock on an owner’s door to request information.

    Yes, through this program you are technically correct that the user has to press a button to send the video to law enforcement through this specific program.

    This implies that the user has the ability to refuse to send the video to law enforcement, but that is not true.

    The videos are stored on Flock/Amazon’s servers and that means that the police can, via a subpoena or court order, access the footage or real-time video from any device or storage that the business can access. You have zero say in this and cannot opt out, the case law on requesting ‘business records’ is long settled as is the idea that digital files are considered ‘business records’.

    In addition, this program does not preclude Flock/Amazon from voluntarily providing access to anybody or any group that asks/pays. The data is theirs, not yours.

    This program is whitewashing the creation of a nation-wide real-time video surveillance network, paid for by you or via your tax dollars.