• drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Years ago in college my mom tried to dump her old CRT TV on me with a roku.

    “we’re leaving this tv with you”

    “I don’t want it, if you leave it here I am throwing it out”

    “Oh son you could use it to watch netflix”

    “or mom i could watch netflix on my phone, my smart tv, my xbox one, my xbox 360, my ps3, my computer, my other computer, my other other computer all of which would be in high resolution. If you leave that here I am putting it where it belongs, in the trash”

    This is a shortened version of the conversation that went on far too long with me getting more and more annoyed with being given garbage.

    • Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      4 days ago

      I would take a CRT in a heartbeat. It makes watching 4:3 content feel right, especially older Star Treks.

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 days ago

        Allegedly it is good with vintage video games (e.g. NES). The weird idiosyncracies of CRTs were accounted for when developing the games.

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          3 days ago

          Not allegedly, it’s quite true. CRT’s tech approach adds gradients, depth to the colors and softens sharp pixel corners. Any sprite based game will look richer on a CRT, but filters are eh 80% good enough

        • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 days ago

          Not just NES; games were largely designed with CRTs in mind all the way through PS2/Xbox/Gamecube console generation!

          Legitimately would love a decent CRT TV (and room for it) to be able to authentically play Point Blank again - light gun games of that era only work on CRTs.

          • frostysauce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            all the way through PS2/Xbox/Gamecube console generation!

            You just gonna ignore the poor Dreamcast like that?

            • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              My bad!

              How could I literally forget Sega’s last, beautiful disaster? 🤦🏻‍♂️ I spent so much time playing Street Fighter III: Third Strike on it back in the day…

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          One thing I find crazy is that at least half of all monitors today are the same res as CRTs from a quarter century ago. I had a $250 no-name brand CRT that handled 1600x1200 quite beautifully in the 1990s.

    • llama@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      They’re obsessed with this idea that people they perceive to be lower on the social hierarchy than them can somehow always have a use for their old stuff. As if using their old stuff is part of the process to become successful like them.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        stuff used to be more expensive relative to wages, especially electronics. our parent’s generation were from a time where a TV cost 3 months rent. now a month of rent is 3 TVs. this also accounts for “you’re poor but you have an iPhone” discourse