• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I think peak was XP.

    Vista was shit. 7 was alright, but not better than XP. 8 was terrible. 10 was worse than 7, but still meh. 11 is dog shit.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        98*/2000 was pure garbage. You could literally bypass the login screen on 98 because it had no real user account and tokens, just profiles for convenience. Driver support was awful, there was no memory protection so drivers constantly caused bsod. XP was the first time the consumer desktop got the NT foundation, meaning real user/session security, far better stability under load, and way fewer “one program crashed, so the OS is toast” moments.

        XP had its problems too, it’s still Windows afterall and Windows was always garbage. But 98 was awful.

        • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yes 98 was terrible. 2000 wasn’t so bad.

          But XP started the data harvesting, the lying to users, the forced applications, and so much more.

          On top of even worse security than 2000 (also nt) had.

          I could go on for days how bad it was.