That’s not what is reported and is something you read into and we don’t know. If there are other requests, then its a different topic. I am strictly talking about the flag, nothing else here (as it is reported).
Actually, the same could not be said for Creamfresh. You’re the only one defending censorship and suppressing an entire group of people and using seemingly logical arguments in bad faith to make your appalling stance sound reasonable while dismissing any rightfully upset counterarguments. Grow up.
There is evidence, you just chose to ignore it. You want proof by pointing at instances in the final game, which will never exist, but the burden of proof rests on you just the same.
I don’t have to proof the opposite something you claim. The article does not proof your claim, nor is it subject of the article and my comments. I am just talking about a flag or something flag like shaped coloring of LGBTQ+. And for me it doesn’t matter if the flag is removed or not, as long as the game is intact. Don’t call people by doing claims you cannot proof.
Can I ask you something else: Would you consider the hypothetical game “intact” if intrinsically planned queer content was removed from the game after a totally hypothetical request?
You don’t see the removal request as an indicator that there might have been similiar attempts during actual development?
Which removal requests are you talking about, if not about the flag?
Of course I mean that request.
That’s not what is reported and is something you read into and we don’t know. If there are other requests, then its a different topic. I am strictly talking about the flag, nothing else here (as it is reported).
You’re either dense or not acting in good faith.
Same could be said about you. Calling people in not good faith because they disagree or don’t believe without evidence isn’t good faith either.
Actually, the same could not be said for Creamfresh. You’re the only one defending censorship and suppressing an entire group of people and using seemingly logical arguments in bad faith to make your appalling stance sound reasonable while dismissing any rightfully upset counterarguments. Grow up.
“Seemingly logical” is generous here. @[email protected] is hardly using logic or critical thinking.
There is evidence, you just chose to ignore it. You want proof by pointing at instances in the final game, which will never exist, but the burden of proof rests on you just the same.
I don’t have to proof the opposite something you claim. The article does not proof your claim, nor is it subject of the article and my comments. I am just talking about a flag or something flag like shaped coloring of LGBTQ+. And for me it doesn’t matter if the flag is removed or not, as long as the game is intact. Don’t call people by doing claims you cannot proof.
Well, the game is canceled so are you done defending bigotry now?
Can I ask you something else: Would you consider the hypothetical game “intact” if intrinsically planned queer content was removed from the game after a totally hypothetical request?