• scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That’s the utilitarian point of view. Even though I often take this POV on many subjects, it would be totalitarian to apply it to cultural matters. Should we adopt one world cuisine that is the easiest to work with? Should we settle everyone on one musical scale and religion, too? It would be a lot more efficient and would facilitate global interaction better.

      Only problem: it would erase who we are.

    • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Even most Esperanto speakers have abadoned the ideology of Finvenkismo (the belief that Esperanto will become the primary language of the world, overtaking other languages) as it’s both unrealistic and has several flaws

      Esperanto is a flawed, Eurocentric language, and we should celebrate linguistic diversity, not treat it as a problem needing to be solved

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The concept of a global language is compatible with linguistic diversity. The Elves, Orcs, and Dwarves all have their own languages, but they also speak the same Common Tongue.

        Our world just doesn’t have a common tongue. It has a handful of very colonially dominant languages.