• Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Hate it. Gave my employer a bad review, 1-2 stars in most categories, and the average was still a 3.7?? I have to adjust my intuition when reading star reviews. Apparently 3.5 is bottom of the barrel.

      • tuff_wizard@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The good news is: that reviews wasn’t really accurate.

        The bad news is: that review wasn’t really anonymous.

        • Randelung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          My last day is Friday. :)

          I’ve tried my best during the last seven years to make a change, both by lobbying upper management and introducing change in my team. Nothing stuck, nobody besides my team mates cared. So I hope it’s not really anonymous. I’m clinging to the illusion they’ll somehow take it to heart now that it’s public, for the betterment of the team mates I leave behind.

      • copd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I don’t understand, are you inferring the reviews do not accurately represent the results?

        • Randelung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t think 3.7 stars accurately describes my experience in that company, yes. But that means that the meaning I gave to what 3.7 stars feels like is not what the company feels like, mostly because my ‘lowest’ would be 0 stars. In my world, 2.5 stars is 50% - but crucially it’s not, 3 stars is 50%. That’s why I have to recalibrate my feelings of the star system.