Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoSensory issuesslrpnk.netimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1510arrow-down130
arrow-up1480arrow-down1imageSensory issuesslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-squareTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoYour argument is valid, but your approach is wrong.
minus-squarebuttnugget@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoWhat other approach do you suggest?
minus-squareTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoLess absolutist in laying out the argument. He comes off as ‘once again I’m proven right’ which isn’t a great way to get a point across. I get the frustration, certainly, but it just shuts down discussion rather than fostering it
Your argument is valid, but your approach is wrong.
What other approach do you suggest?
Less absolutist in laying out the argument. He comes off as ‘once again I’m proven right’ which isn’t a great way to get a point across.
I get the frustration, certainly, but it just shuts down discussion rather than fostering it