I can’t help but presume you’re a high ranking member of proton, perhaps a director level staff member; why else should you have this information readily available? Interesting that you’d be so revealing on a thread where you’re likely to be scrutinized by the audience.

Anyhow, when I read the email I get the impression that you’re sugar coating the process of shoving AI down the throat of your engineers.

Did anyone consider having a normal performance review, where you don’t interrogate engineers on the tools they choose to utilize?

People will be loosing their jobs based on their answers, or won’t even be given the chance to answer based on pre-existing knowledge of their AI usage. Answers that don’t involve AI how you’d like are not good answers. That’s clear. There’s no way to be intellectually honest while pretending otherwise.