• cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I think I could chill with Marx¹, he was a shockingly decent guy for the time. Engels was a piece of fucking shit and I’m not reading anything else he wrote.

    ¹teaboo capitalism-loving steam engine fetishist that he was

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Engels’ contributions to Marxist theory are critical works, such as Anti-Dühring and On the Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State, and neither him nor Marx by any means loved capitalism. He was crucial to the development of dialectical materialism and scientific socialism, and was Marx’s biggest sponsor and comrade.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      True dat. AFAIK, Engels mostly regurgitated Marx anyway. So nothing much lost in terms of theory.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Engels co-developed dialectical materialism and scientific socialism, Marx could not have done what he did without his best friend and comrade.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Dunno why you have to phrase it in a sexual manner. Engels sponsored a lot of Marx’s work, and was a valuable comrade when writing theory together. Engels is one of Marxism’s most important theorists, and by no means was simply regurgitating Marx; he was the one Marx bounced ideas off of and they together grew to develop Marxism.

            • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              5 months ago

              Dunno why you have to phrase it in a sexual manner

              Interpreting “sugar daddy” in a sexual manner says more about you than the usage of the word does about me. (As does remarking on it at all: I don’t care whether or not Marx and Engels were in a sexual relationship… do you?)

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                “Sugar Daddy” implies Marx gave Engels sexual favors in exchange for cash or other goods, housing, etc. That’s the meaning of the “Sugar” part of the phrase “Sugar Daddy.” You made it sexual, not me. No, I would not have had any issue with them being gay, except for that being cheating in presumably monogamous relationships. I myself am pan, so I don’t know what you’re doing here.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    The “Sugar” part still refers to the connotations of sexual favors, that’s the assumption with such terms. I get that it was a joke, I just don’t like the way sexual relationships are used in a negative manner when describing people, especially if it isn’t even true, like calling Putin and Trump gay for each other.