• Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    So basically you need to spam me. Because a donation plea every so often . . .doesn’t get enough addresses to sell?

    I’m saying it’s a flawed implementation is all.

    • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Purely anecdotal but they’re the only news site that I’ve ever given my email to and I actually enjoy seeing their emails. They send entire (interesting) articles that can be read with no CSS/tracking images enabled and their monetisation is a small text ad that breaks a single couple of paragraphs.

      I’ve never gotten an email from them that was begging for money or anything like that, just basically an RSS feed of interesting articles

    • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The idea that forcing a signup (building a web of information about a user through the use of cookies and other browser metadata) to protect against AI (that is gonna use tooling, mirrors, proxies and any number of fully working methodologies) is ludicrous.

      They just want to track who you are, what you do, and then sell that data which should never have been gathered in the first place as part of their advertising revenue.

      • DesertCreosote@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Normally I would agree with you, but given how much they care about privacy (as indicated by what they write about and talk about on their podcast), I don’t think tracking is what they’re after in this specific case.

        And they know that the signup won’t completely block AI, but it does help.