silence7@slrpnk.net to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 hours agoHow Big Oil says carbon capture works" vs "how carbon capture actually worksslrpnk.netimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1324arrow-down14
arrow-up1320arrow-down1imageHow Big Oil says carbon capture works" vs "how carbon capture actually worksslrpnk.netsilence7@slrpnk.net to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-square18107@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·11 hours agoWe absolutely do need carbon capture research and development, along with gradually scaling up carbon capture projects. Unfortunately, carbon capture is useless if we’re still burning fossil fuels for power, heat, and transport. Carbon capture is actively harmful when used as an excuse to build new fossil fuel power plants.
minus-squareTankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 hours ago Unfortunately, carbon capture is useless if we’re still burning fossil fuels for power, heat, and transport. Carbon capture is actively harmful when used as an excuse to build new fossil fuel power plants. Yeah, it’s a blank check to just produce more CO2.
minus-squareWanderingThoughts@europe.publinkfedilinkarrow-up17·11 hours agoCarbon capture is the best way to convert vague promises to subsidies.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 hours agoIf you can scale it up on renewables only to somewhere around a few million tons a year, then maybe.
We absolutely do need carbon capture research and development, along with gradually scaling up carbon capture projects.
Unfortunately, carbon capture is useless if we’re still burning fossil fuels for power, heat, and transport.
Carbon capture is actively harmful when used as an excuse to build new fossil fuel power plants.
Yeah, it’s a blank check to just produce more CO2.
Carbon capture is the best way to convert vague promises to subsidies.
If you can scale it up on renewables only to somewhere around a few million tons a year, then maybe.