Despite massive investments and widespread hype around artificial intelligence, the technology has delivered zero financial payoff to corporate America outside of tech. Subscribe for daily updates.
when you use AI, its going to hallucinate, it might even make up results at worst, and not cite the SOURCES correctly, very important a research paper, if its summarizing from different sources, (it will be kinda hard to parse all that info). in a science paper, when you cite a source you have to do like a superscript like 1 denoting the order of the sources you got it from. it gets messy when someone calls out your paper, and they get the publisher/you to retract it.
This was true a year ago but most state of the art models are rather good at citing sources now. Haven’t had any issues with my papers so far which was not the case last year.
Only thing I have noticed now is that sometimes understanding the source is a different story. It will get the gist but lacks nuance written in the source present in the paper. But the papers exist at least when it refers to papers in my field.
when you use AI, its going to hallucinate, it might even make up results at worst, and not cite the SOURCES correctly, very important a research paper, if its summarizing from different sources, (it will be kinda hard to parse all that info). in a science paper, when you cite a source you have to do like a superscript like 1 denoting the order of the sources you got it from. it gets messy when someone calls out your paper, and they get the publisher/you to retract it.
This was true a year ago but most state of the art models are rather good at citing sources now. Haven’t had any issues with my papers so far which was not the case last year.
Only thing I have noticed now is that sometimes understanding the source is a different story. It will get the gist but lacks nuance written in the source present in the paper. But the papers exist at least when it refers to papers in my field.