• TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    it’s not about smart vs stupid. it’s about skeptical vs gullible.

    plenty of very smart people are gullible. and most people are gullible because it’s ‘nice’.

    most of us who are skeptical are see as cold, mean, and anti-social. hence to be pro-social you have to be ‘stupid’ and believe in the nonsense everyone else is going on about.

    • meliaesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I haven’t seen this perspective before. What makes you think healthy skepticism needs to be demeaning or rude?

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They’re saying skeptics are perceived that way, not that they necessarily are acting that way. Just that other people clock you as “not nice” when you don’t always take what they say at face value.

          • SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            48 minutes ago

            Learning can be uncomfortable, and one persons sources of motivation could be another persons’s trigger points for mis-associated signals for impending stress or injury.

      • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The conmen whom you question will make the effort to color your skepticism as demeaning and rude.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        it isn’t.

        but people interpret it that way. because it’s not ‘friendly’ to ask questions or be skeptical. people typically get angry if you ask them why they do something… and they regard your blind acceptance of them as positive.