FenrirIII@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoFlying cars crash into each other at Chinese air showwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1186arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1183arrow-down1external-linkFlying cars crash into each other at Chinese air showwww.bbc.comFenrirIII@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square52fedilinkfile-text
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/36069403 cross-posted from: https://lemy.lol/post/52477761
minus-squareFauxLiving@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down9·1 day agoThe cars are autonomous, we need them because people can’t even manage a zip merge.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 hours agoSo the flying vehicles that apparently crashed into each other of their own accord are safer than cars? Really?
minus-squareFauxLiving@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoI’m not sure if you’re aware, but regular cars crash into each other as well.
minus-squaremic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·21 hours agoKnow what can be automated a lot easier than cars or planes, and can carry orders of magnitude more people with much less fuel usage? Fucking trains.
minus-squareFauxLiving@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·19 hours agoYeah, a quadcopter train sounds like the obvious next step.
The cars are autonomous, we need them because people can’t even manage a zip merge.
So the flying vehicles that apparently crashed into each other of their own accord are safer than cars? Really?
I’m not sure if you’re aware, but regular cars crash into each other as well.
Know what can be automated a lot easier than cars or planes, and can carry orders of magnitude more people with much less fuel usage? Fucking trains.
Yeah, a quadcopter train sounds like the obvious next step.