• shaiatan@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’m well aware the plural of “anecdote” isn’t “data”, but literally no dev I know (senior or otherwise) thinks this. Give me a junior work with - most of them at least actually learn.

    • criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah it’s the same skillset I use with Junior devs except I don’t have the hope AI will grow out of its bad habits

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Amen. I’ve tried the vibe coding thing but it’s frustrating because a) too often the AI output has some profound problems and it gets annoying ‘babysitting’ it; and b) I usually prefer the challenge of figuring out syntax and implementation issues myself.

      If something is taking too long I’ll ask the LLM. But I feel like if I do this too much my skill set will atrophy and I’ll lose my sharpness. So it’s a balancing act.

      But this brings up another wider question: where is the line between “occasionally getting AI help” and “vibe coding”? Surely it’s subjective.

      • Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The definition may have changed but I feel like originally it was only vibe coding when the “dev” did not know what they are doing. When some one with little to no programming background is able to build and app on “vibes” alone.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Also applies when the dev could know what they’re doing, but just doesn’t care to.

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          My first interpretation of vibe coding was to code for fun and personal enjoyment without worrying about industry standards or deployability. More often see with self-taught youth.

          I felt like i have been doing this for years before ai became a thing.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I don’t think the two cross, really. A vibe coder asks for a bunch of features and then starts refining the output, fixing bugs and adding features. A developer knows the specific architecture and from years of writing tasks knows how to break work into manageable chunks and uses AI to implement something they have already defined and know where it fits in. The skill to write a good story isn’t far off from writing a good prompt.

        I use AI all the time, and every time I hear someone describing vibe coding it makes my skin crawl.

      • pheonixdown@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’d say the use cases of: mundane but time consuming, pointed inquiries or interactive rubber ducking, are all getting AI help. Offloading a design where you don’t have a clear understanding of how it should be done is vibing.