You don’t have to be a “JSTKL stan” to hate Destiny, I barely know of JSTKL’s existence btw. Most things I learn about Destiny and those around him are against my will.
Lmao, of course. Whatever you need to tell yourself.
Slight correction on the previous commenter, the lawsuit is about revenge porn rather than CSAM directly
Extraordinarily generous to call that a “slight correction”.
the fact that a minor is involved was mentioned more than once
And yet you and Velma are out here spreading misinformation about it in order to establish guilt by association for another person. Weird behavior, but I guess I’ll make of that what I will.
So your concern is that, on the advice of council, he didn’t delete images he got from a catfishing stalker of an assumed 19 year old to avoid spoliation for this court case (which is literally what pxie is falsely accusing him of doing in order to shamelessly stall the case btw)? Okay…
Ethan (and Hila) of the H3 podcast constantly spew Hasbara, and only performatively use “Free Palestine” to dodge criticism and show themselves as being progressive or actually caring about Palestinians when they in fact do not act in any way that suggests that they do. Hila was in the IDF (yes, it’s “mandatory” but you can also refuse and go to jail which is moral, or know the right people and excuses and dodge it, which Hila claimed she could have done, if I remember correctly) and both her and Ethan have stated people should be proud to serve. Hila herself went on a night raid in Ramallah (where she witnessed the kidnapping of a Palestinian) “because [she] was bored” when she wasn’t supposed to, and does not seem to regret it one bit.
Like I said, thinly veiled anti-semitic smears to establish guilt by association.
I’m too lazy to read the court docs but I’ll just say this:
IF what you’re saying is true about the case being about a revenge porn case involving a (pretend) 19-year old girl, and the above commenters are claiming it as CSAM or sexting involving minors, then this is gross misinformation and you should not be downvoted so hard for calling it out.
Rose is the underage girl whose photos were traded with Destiny and it came out during the civil case between Pixie and Destiny when she sued over her sex pics being leaked.
It’s a little complicated and Destiny fans will bury conversations in “well actually”s until you want to pull your hair out.
Destiny is currently in litigation for all of this and being investigated for possession of Rose’s pics from when she was underage.
It sounds like this case is actively being investigated by legal authorities, and whether or not Destiny knowingly possessed CSAM is still not determined.
I think the responsible thing for the internet to do is to wait until clearer facts come out, instead of casting judgement early and making the situation way more messy.
It’s not even involving a pretend 19-year old girl really. That was only mentioned because it’s something that predates this case, but leads into it (grasping at literally anything to be able to call him a pedophile and establish guilt by association). The person who catfished Destiny (while pretending to be Rose) leaked a bunch of his explicit images and videos as part of his harassment campaign against him, and Pxie (a different person, not related to the catfisher or the Rose person) is suing Destiny because one of those videos happened to include her.
So they’re essentially both victims of a separate revenge-porn incident, but this case is not about the Rose person at all.
And Velma and fif-t clearly know this, that’s why they backed off as soon as it was clear I could counter the talking points they’re parroting.
No, I stopped because I have no interest in debating with a wannabe debate-lord about things we will never agree on. Like the genocide denying guy you’re defending (which you never contested, because you know it’s true). You didn’t bother contesting it because you probably also deny the genocide.
And I think you’re a dickweed.
I probably shouldn’t have even written this reply, if I’m honest. But I’ll leave it there.
No, I stopped because I have no interest in debating with a wannabe debate-lord about things we will never agree on
Like the facts I presented that completely contradict your claims.
Like the genocide denying guy you’re defending (which you never contested, because you know it’s true). You didn’t bother contesting it because you probably also deny the genocide.
No, it was covered in my original comment under “misleading”.
And I think you’re a dickweed.
My heavens!
I probably shouldn’t have even written this reply, if I’m honest. But I’ll leave it there.
But you just couldn’t resist coming back to let me know that you were emotionally impacted by having your narrative shown to be misleading/false. I get it. Hard to sollow your pride after getting caught out.
I’m just glad to see at least one other person got to see how disgusting you and Velma are being.
Lmao, of course. Whatever you need to tell yourself.
Extraordinarily generous to call that a “slight correction”.
And by “minor”, you mean a stalker who catfished Destiny by pretending to be a 19 year old girl, right? https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69650487/178/doe-v-bonnell/
And yet you and Velma are out here spreading misinformation about it in order to establish guilt by association for another person. Weird behavior, but I guess I’ll make of that what I will.
So your concern is that, on the advice of council, he didn’t delete images he got from a catfishing stalker of an assumed 19 year old to avoid spoliation for this court case (which is literally what pxie is falsely accusing him of doing in order to shamelessly stall the case btw)? Okay…
Like I said, thinly veiled anti-semitic smears to establish guilt by association.
Agree to disagree.
I’m too lazy to read the court docs but I’ll just say this:
IF what you’re saying is true about the case being about a revenge porn case involving a (pretend) 19-year old girl, and the above commenters are claiming it as CSAM or sexting involving minors, then this is gross misinformation and you should not be downvoted so hard for calling it out.
Rose is the underage girl whose photos were traded with Destiny and it came out during the civil case between Pixie and Destiny when she sued over her sex pics being leaked.
It’s a little complicated and Destiny fans will bury conversations in “well actually”s until you want to pull your hair out.
Destiny is currently in litigation for all of this and being investigated for possession of Rose’s pics from when she was underage.
It sounds like this case is actively being investigated by legal authorities, and whether or not Destiny knowingly possessed CSAM is still not determined.
I think the responsible thing for the internet to do is to wait until clearer facts come out, instead of casting judgement early and making the situation way more messy.
It’s not even involving a pretend 19-year old girl really. That was only mentioned because it’s something that predates this case, but leads into it (grasping at literally anything to be able to call him a pedophile and establish guilt by association). The person who catfished Destiny (while pretending to be Rose) leaked a bunch of his explicit images and videos as part of his harassment campaign against him, and Pxie (a different person, not related to the catfisher or the Rose person) is suing Destiny because one of those videos happened to include her.
So they’re essentially both victims of a separate revenge-porn incident, but this case is not about the Rose person at all.
And Velma and fif-t clearly know this, that’s why they backed off as soon as it was clear I could counter the talking points they’re parroting.
No, I stopped because I have no interest in debating with a wannabe debate-lord about things we will never agree on. Like the genocide denying guy you’re defending (which you never contested, because you know it’s true). You didn’t bother contesting it because you probably also deny the genocide.
And I think you’re a dickweed.
I probably shouldn’t have even written this reply, if I’m honest. But I’ll leave it there.
Like the facts I presented that completely contradict your claims.
No, it was covered in my original comment under “misleading”.
My heavens!
But you just couldn’t resist coming back to let me know that you were emotionally impacted by having your narrative shown to be misleading/false. I get it. Hard to sollow your pride after getting caught out.
I’m just glad to see at least one other person got to see how disgusting you and Velma are being.
Swallow*