• AppleTea@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I get that this isn’t an option for everyone. Part of why I wrote it in such big text without any qualifiers is that it is an option for a significant amount of people, yet frequently gets completely overlooked.

    But I gotta ask

    Why would you make a 25-munute drive but stop at the bottom of the hill? Why not just drive the rest of the way up?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Why should I put in effort, they don’t, the content creators don’t.

      The content creators have not built a method via which I can legitimately give them money. If they wish to do that then we can talk but they apparently are not interested.

      I have no idea what an earth it is that you think I should do instead, clearly you are an intellectual though so I would value your input.

      • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        For high cost production that takes tens or hundreds of people to make, it’s usually not up to the actual artists and creators how their stuff gets distributed. That’s up to the publishers. They kinda… destroyed their older distribution methods, each one chasing the impossible goal of a streaming monopoly.

        For some people, local Libraries are an option. If that isn’t feasible, there are other options. Legal or otherwise. Whatever works, works. Most artists care more that you engage with their work, than how you got a hold of it. They already got paid, and residuals are less and less offered (or weaseled out of) by the publishers.