• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    There was no agreement for both to “go in,” no formal plan to do so, and World War II certainly wasn’t “done” afterwards.

    • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I meant they agreed to divide Poland’s area according to the lines mentioned “if something happened to it (heh)”. So stopping the attack and handing over extra parts are all according to keikaku.

      World War II certainly wasn’t “done” afterwards

      No I meant dividing Poland part from the agreement.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago
        1. Why did the Soviets move in to Poland?

        2. Why not fully agree to joint-invasion in a secret section of the pact?

        You have no answers for this, again, you seem to be arguing that the Nazis should have been allowed to extend the Holocaust to all of Poland, including the areas Poland annexxed from Lithuania and Ukraine.

        • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          #1 Soviets probably wanted their part. And I’m not sure what benefit there would’ve been in #2 that they didn’t get this way.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago
            1. No, lmao. The Soviets had little economic incentive to invade, their economy was a planned one and not one that relied on colonization like the Nazis. Get a better answer.

            2. They didn’t agree to an invasion in the pact, that’s why.

            • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              But invade they did and got their part. As agreed.

              Why not fully agree to joint-invasion in a secret section of the pact?

              They didn’t agree to an invasion in the pact, that’s why.

              It doesn’t really answer the question of what benefit there would’ve been to “fully agree to joint-invasion” when they got everything they wanted to out of the pact with the postponed invasion

                • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  They got their part, as agreed. That much is just a fact. Same for the invasion happening. As for a coordinated attack, no such thing, but joint attack in the sense that both were attacking Poland at the same time.