• fantoozie@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I also agree with you that it’s unraveling. But that’s why’d I’d rather try to adapt now and face the reality than pretend I can have Amazon Prime and not participate in killing life on Earth.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Oh, agree. But how many people do you think we can sustain your way globally in the coming decades? We are projected to reach 10 billion by 2050 by some estimates.

      • fantoozie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’d argue we’re already in overshoot as far as carrying capacity, if we’re using current standards of living in the West as the baseline. In that sense, population decline is inevitable.

        Its impossible for me to answer the question you’re asking, but I posit this: at this point, what is the alternative? Can we keep affording to slow-walk actionable solutions to climate change? What are the wealthy nations of the world willing to sacrifice to sustain Earth’s future as our home? How will we decide who and what to preserve, and who and what is worth losing?