Godric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 27 days agoHappy anniversary of the day absolutely nothing happened at nowhere square!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square166fedilinkarrow-up1956arrow-down145
arrow-up1911arrow-down1imageHappy anniversary of the day absolutely nothing happened at nowhere square!lemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 27 days agomessage-square166fedilink
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down4·25 days agoVibes based statistics
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·25 days agoNo. I looked at different testimonials and believe this estimation is safer and closer to a potential reality.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·25 days agoAnd those would be?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·25 days agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre - Death toll section I believe I checked the numbers at the French page some time ago, and based on the diversity of reports and their background, I personally believed that it was around 500. I do get that people can estimate a bit more or a bit less though.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down6·25 days agoSo Wikipedia is what convinced you?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·25 days agoWikipedia is a community-driven encyclopedia based on sources. All claims include a source. What do you want more? Those articles being on a controversial topic, have been moderated and are pretty well done in my opinion.
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-225 days agoYou should ask him about this : https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421 Seem to be too much for him.
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·25 days agoWe got it. They’re avoiding to answer or acknowledge your comment.
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-225 days agoNot my comment though. And he answer and acknowledged my comment fine. But not this one I wonder why. Edit : typo
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·25 days agoSo it was Wikipedia that convinced you?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·25 days agoI was convinced something happened way before this, but for the number of deaths, yes, that was my source.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·25 days agoOk. They’d fail you for that in highschool
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·25 days agoWhy do you avoid answering to the comment with fact in it ? https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·25 days agoWhy do you keep resorting to lazy personal attacks?
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-225 days agoBecause you keep choosing to answer weak arguments. Just to precise, in what was it a perosnnal attack ?
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·25 days agoAnd you keep choosing to resort to lazy personal attacks. And you know which ones are personal attacks, don’t play dumb
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·25 days agoHo I am 100% convinced your a paid troll, sorry if it hurt you. But you still avoid answering.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down6·25 days agoIf that was true you wouldn’t keep replying. You know I’m not, you’re just using it as a personal attack
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·25 days agoLol no because I love to play with troll. I you were not I would have let it go since long before. Since your paid you should work
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·25 days agoDid that even make sense in your head?
Vibes based statistics
No. I looked at different testimonials and believe this estimation is safer and closer to a potential reality.
And those would be?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre - Death toll section
I believe I checked the numbers at the French page some time ago, and based on the diversity of reports and their background, I personally believed that it was around 500. I do get that people can estimate a bit more or a bit less though.
So Wikipedia is what convinced you?
Wikipedia is a community-driven encyclopedia based on sources. All claims include a source.
What do you want more?
Those articles being on a controversial topic, have been moderated and are pretty well done in my opinion.
You should ask him about this : https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421 Seem to be too much for him.
We got it. They’re avoiding to answer or acknowledge your comment.
Not my comment though. And he answer and acknowledged my comment fine. But not this one I wonder why. Edit : typo
So it was Wikipedia that convinced you?
I was convinced something happened way before this, but for the number of deaths, yes, that was my source.
Ok. They’d fail you for that in highschool
Why do you avoid answering to the comment with fact in it ? https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421
Why do you keep resorting to lazy personal attacks?
Because you keep choosing to answer weak arguments. Just to precise, in what was it a perosnnal attack ?
And you keep choosing to resort to lazy personal attacks. And you know which ones are personal attacks, don’t play dumb
Ho I am 100% convinced your a paid troll, sorry if it hurt you. But you still avoid answering.
If that was true you wouldn’t keep replying. You know I’m not, you’re just using it as a personal attack
Lol no because I love to play with troll. I you were not I would have let it go since long before. Since your paid you should work
Did that even make sense in your head?