• MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I cannot muster sufficient hubris to say it can’t get worse than AI slop, yet for the sake for whatever remains of my sanity I refuse to believe it can, let alone attempt to imagine what such an atrocity against aesthetics would look like.

  • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    The worst future: AI art continues to improve until it actually is indistinguishable from human art for 99% of the population. But the cost in turn rises. It costs maybe a quarter of what a human artist would need to charge for the same work. Still cheap enough to mostly put human artists out of business, but still by no means cheap or affordable. The AI companies drive the real artists out of their fields, and then raise the prices as high as they can without allowing a new crop of commercial artists to spring up.

  • arrow74@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I can’t tell you how often I’ve been walking around looking for a place to eat and I see all these AI generated slop menus with AI generated food photos. I just walk away from those places. I can almost forgive the AI generated format for the menu, almost. But I can’t forgive the food photos

    • fishy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I was browsing for new restaurants in my area and someone unaffiliated with the restaurant had uploaded AI images of food. Like WTF?

  • KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    TIL that corporate blandness had a name.

    I think it had it’s place as inoffensive background filler but obviously was overdone.

    AI slop is usually so out of place everywhere and it’s quickly gone straight to abused.

  • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    ah but what if AI slop Corporate Memphis??

    actually that mostly looks accurate lmao except the leaf growing out of the window sill, and the space between blue shirt’s armpit area should probably be white

    • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      They have no faces. They have no eyes. Their ears are smooth slabs. They cannot taste, smell, hear, or see. They cannot even breathe the air around them. They cannot speak. And yet, they somehow persist, kept animate and aware by unknown Eldritch forces. They have no mouths, yet they must scream.

      A plant phasing through walls? Strangely blue-shifted light? Whose to say how physics works in their Godless world? I do not know what Hell these beings dwell in, but I pray that I am never reincarnated there.

      • athatet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        It wasn’t ‘intended’ to be anything. It’s just slop. That’s the problem.

      • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        could be yea, I think a human artist would have made that more obvious to look intentional, like have the chair poking out to his side and above his shoulder

  • phar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Search engines are not really helping me here. Does anyone have real world examples from companies the general public knows that incorporates corporate Memphis? I don’t really remember seeing it that often and I feel like maybe I’m on crazy pills

    • MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      For an example of what these illustrations evolved into look at Firefox.com. But overall they have died not because of AI Slop, but because they got stale and any hangover over the last couple years was from “pre-built” templates.

      From personal experience I’d see it in PowerPoints, business to business (B2B) marketing, and a lot of SaS or digital tech products.

      A lot of companies in those spaces went abstract or geometric and phased stock photos of people laughing at nothing back into their marketing.

      The stock images of people is what these Memphis stick figures replaced because it was easier to spin things up quickly without agonizing over getting photographic diversity, which was kind of a driver at the time.

      It’s my job to keep an eye on trends.

        • MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          They are good. The illustration style that was dominated by these Memphis people for areas that still need some illustrative “fun” has shifted to gradients and more color. The roots of simplistic illustration are still there, just improved.

          This too will get stale. Design trends used to last close to a decade, than down to 5 years around the 2000s. Now it’s more like maybe 2 years before everyone gets bored. That’s only going to accelerate.

          But as the cycle goes around and around, it always seems to comeback to swiss design. Modified of course, but the base DNA is always there because it’s what all us designers had beaten into us as visual communicators.

          All this Memphis, flat design, geometric bullshit is dressing on that basis that still works. Because at the Bauhaus school they looked closely at the psychology of visual communication and recorded what works and why to be an authority on the subject.

          At the end of the day, a design is a failure if it doesn’t communicate to the viewer. Everything else consumers see are distractions marketing VPs and CEOs feel like they need because they “paid good money for something NEW”.