• Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Well, first I tweak my windows to mimic the appearance of the windows that I liked, windows 7. Then I tweak my Linux to mimic that.

    Just because hurr durr windows bad, doesn’t mean their huge team of UI and UX designers didn’t ever come up with a good design. And like most things Microsoft, I take pleasure in pirating it when I can.

    • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      IMO, Windows’s UI/UX might seem good only if you haven’t tried anything actually different. Tiling/scrolling WMs is the way.

      • skidicarus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’m pretty much always picking XFCE or KDE over just a WM. In the case of KDE, I use it like Windows. I make XFCE as Unity-like as possible, which I believe is the best interface for limited screen real estate.

        • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’m using the term “WM” loosely, as a more of a general term here.

          And no, i can’t call a DE that adds a title bar to every window, has a huge-ass taskbar, and a limited amount of free space per workspace “best for limited screen real estate”. Something like Niri, MangoWC or Hyprland (with scrolling layout enabled) works much better and cleaner precisely in that regard, since they offer

          a) a hotkey-first UX, meaning that everything usually represented by a UI button is moved to the keyboard and no longer needs to clutter the screen

          b) literally infinite horizontal space.

          I literally can’t go back ever since i gave tiling a try, any floating de/wm now feels clunky and awkward to me.