I don’t think they’d care? Other than “well, don’t wanna see my parent naked”
I can’t imagine a porn actress/actor teaching their kids to be stuck-up prudish misogynistic assholes.
Porn actors tend to be people who think the exact opposite, that people are too prudish
“Actresses”?
I haven’t read that word this century.
“Mommy! Mommy! I saw you on the internet! Tommy has shown me a video!”
a Skeletor Reminder:
“Due to the fact that humans are no different from any other animal when it applies to the genetics of breeding, the children of two pornstars should therefore be better pornstars than their parents.”
UNTIL WE MEET AGAIN!
nice try, eugenics guy.
bud, Eugenics (as a theory) is not incorrect, just how stupid, evil people apply it. It’s the reason African americans dominate American sports: The slavers spent 300 years breeding them for strength and endurance, because that’s also what makes a good slave. It’s morally wrong, yes (100%), but it’s also objectively true.
evolution and dna and genes are true, but eugenics as a pseudoscience is objectively fucking stupid and bigoted.
apropos of nothing else:
Can you breed a dog? Can you breed a cat? Can you breed a Horse? Can you breed a Bird? Can you breed a Snake? Can you breed a Spider? Can you breed a Fish?
HUMANS ARE NO DIFFERENT
I’m not claiming its Right to do, JUST THAT IT’S POSSIBLE
except that breeding two scientists does not make a child who’s good at science in the same way breeding two robust dogs makes another.
well that’s true for other animals as well. The “objectionable” part is the controlled breeding. If you were to single out the smart ones that DID excell and made them have kids eventually you would start to see results. But indeed, that is the rub. It’s wrong to force that sort of thing upon people with out their consent. That’s why Eugenics doesn’t work, not because the theory is unsound.
start to see results
no. no you won’t. and there is zero evidence you would. zero.
Imagine if she took part in a pregnancy fetish porn.
Than they’d finally get to know who their dad was.
And why not the children of male porn performers?
Misogyny
With relatively few exceptions, those don’t get a lot of attention, often aren’t even mentioned.
There’s a sort of pride in your parent handing out the backshots, less so if your parent was the one taking said backshots.
i wonder what this says about societal gender roles as a whole🤔
Tbh considering the porn trends in last couple years, it’s more likely this
Porn actors in general
was just gonna say this
Very NSFW, but related: https://www.sexylosers.com/comic/201/
i wouldn’t mind having such an origin story tbh
Man, I remember reading this comic in college when it was new.
Yeah, same. I can’t believe it’s been 23 years.
With the amount of porn that is generated everyday you have lick finding again a video you saw a week before, now try to find something 20 years old.
YT-DL works on porn sites
SkeletorLessonMeme.gif
Not always. Lately it seems they’ve gotten better at blocking. Though I do know yt-dlp has a ton of options for spoofing credentials and stuff, so it can prob still be done. Just not as simple as it used to be
I’d hazard the number one reason people consume porn is because they don’t have lick
I can imagine how fun it must be for kids knowing their parents did the thing, then got pregant, and afterwards still kept doing the thing.
Case in point, Remy Lacroix.
But then kids need to associate their parent to their artistic name which may not be obvious.
security through obscurity
