Your challenge was to name any way in which marijuana has changed regarding its status as an intoxicant at any point in human history, you can’t do that and you know it so you’re deflecting desperately to avoid admitting you’re wrong. Everyone everywhere knows what marijuana does, and what it does is fuck you up without any possibility of lethal overdose or permanent damage. Other drugs are not relevant at all, every single one of them can kill you, marijuana cannot, they are entirely separate categories. Have some fucking dignity and take the L.
So, to be clear, your only complaint is that I replied to the comment where you said “try again”, rather than directly to your original comment? OK, then go back and read them as if I was responding to your original comment. You said something, a person responded, and you correctly pointed out they were wrong. Told them to try again to refute your original statement. I refuted tour original statement, and if you thought I was responding directly to your rebuttal, rather than to “try again” to refute your original claim, consider that I am now informing you that my whole intent was, and always has been, to refute your original claim. I don’t give a fuck about the cultivation history of hemp, and it’s not where the problem lies in your original assertion. No further additions are necessary.
Complaint =/= argument, the argument is that marijuana is unchanged in all of human history in regard to being an intoxicant and completely unique in being impossible to OD on, complaint is that you’re so fucking dumb that I have to explain that shit to you and explain the difference between the two. Swing and a miss halfwit.
Wordy+still failed=embarassing
Your challenge was to name any way in which marijuana has changed regarding its status as an intoxicant at any point in human history, you can’t do that and you know it so you’re deflecting desperately to avoid admitting you’re wrong. Everyone everywhere knows what marijuana does, and what it does is fuck you up without any possibility of lethal overdose or permanent damage. Other drugs are not relevant at all, every single one of them can kill you, marijuana cannot, they are entirely separate categories. Have some fucking dignity and take the L.
So, to be clear, your only complaint is that I replied to the comment where you said “try again”, rather than directly to your original comment? OK, then go back and read them as if I was responding to your original comment. You said something, a person responded, and you correctly pointed out they were wrong. Told them to try again to refute your original statement. I refuted tour original statement, and if you thought I was responding directly to your rebuttal, rather than to “try again” to refute your original claim, consider that I am now informing you that my whole intent was, and always has been, to refute your original claim. I don’t give a fuck about the cultivation history of hemp, and it’s not where the problem lies in your original assertion. No further additions are necessary.
My complaint is that morons like you exist, and that the war on drugs was allowed to happen at all. Not entirely unrelated issues.
So, nothing but workers ad hominem, then. Right. Carry on
An ad hominem is when the argument is an insult, in this case my arguments are merely accompanied by insults, you fucking moron
“My complaint is that morons like you exist”
If that is your complaint, then your complaint lacks any argument other than that you don’t like it, plus an ad hominem.
Complaint =/= argument, the argument is that marijuana is unchanged in all of human history in regard to being an intoxicant and completely unique in being impossible to OD on, complaint is that you’re so fucking dumb that I have to explain that shit to you and explain the difference between the two. Swing and a miss halfwit.