So, to be clear, your only complaint is that I replied to the comment where you said “try again”, rather than directly to your original comment? OK, then go back and read them as if I was responding to your original comment. You said something, a person responded, and you correctly pointed out they were wrong. Told them to try again to refute your original statement. I refuted tour original statement, and if you thought I was responding directly to your rebuttal, rather than to “try again” to refute your original claim, consider that I am now informing you that my whole intent was, and always has been, to refute your original claim. I don’t give a fuck about the cultivation history of hemp, and it’s not where the problem lies in your original assertion. No further additions are necessary.
So, to be clear, your only complaint is that I replied to the comment where you said “try again”, rather than directly to your original comment? OK, then go back and read them as if I was responding to your original comment. You said something, a person responded, and you correctly pointed out they were wrong. Told them to try again to refute your original statement. I refuted tour original statement, and if you thought I was responding directly to your rebuttal, rather than to “try again” to refute your original claim, consider that I am now informing you that my whole intent was, and always has been, to refute your original claim. I don’t give a fuck about the cultivation history of hemp, and it’s not where the problem lies in your original assertion. No further additions are necessary.
My complaint is that morons like you exist, and that the war on drugs was allowed to happen at all. Not entirely unrelated issues.
So, nothing but workers ad hominem, then. Right. Carry on
An ad hominem is when the argument is an insult, in this case my arguments are merely accompanied by insults, you fucking moron