• commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    By your logic, dog meat farms are fine – amoral. The cruelty does not matter because it is inherent.

    not quite but very close. the suffering is not cruelty because it is inherent, and suffering alone does not change the morality.

    • naught@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      To willingly inflict unnecessary suffering on sentient beings is cruelty. This is a semantic argument that ignores reality

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is a semantic argument that ignores reality

        no, it’s not. but this is a thought terminating cliche

        • naught@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You are literally arguing the definition of the word “cruelty” rather than dealing with the substance. I appreciate the engagement, but this is where I’ll stop. I hope you consider the conflicts in your worldview and work toward improving the world for yourself and the beings that inhabit it.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I hope you consider the conflicts in your worldview and work toward improving the world for yourself and the beings that inhabit it.

            YOU, TOO