Racists gonna racist. Who cares which junk they have in their pants? What’s next, gonna point out that they wore watches? Watch wearers are horrible people!!1!
Irrelevant info leads to useless patterns. The relevance is that racists are horrible. You don’t need more for that pattern.
I don’t know her motivation. I do not assume. I just know that two men brutally murdered a child for racist motives and you are trying to make that into women being a systemic problem (because that is what the bear discussion is about. Systemic, socially normalised violence). Wrong turn.
Another edit after your edit: nobody says all men were the same though. You are just trying to imply I would.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmett_Till
Sometimes women are the bear.
Racists gonna racist. Who cares which junk they have in their pants? What’s next, gonna point out that they wore watches? Watch wearers are horrible people!!1!
Irrelevant info leads to useless patterns. The relevance is that racists are horrible. You don’t need more for that pattern.
Trying to twist a racist lynch murderof a 14 year old boy into “muh, women bad” is a choice. A disgusting, despicable choice, but a choice.
Who initiated the racist lunch murder? Was it a woman?
Two grown men according to your article. Encouraged by the Jim Crow-Era social conduct.
Do not try to stir up some misogynist bullshit here. Do not try to relativize racism here. That shit won’t fly here.
The violence still came from men. They killed a 14 year old boy. Do you think that’s excusable or what?
Of course not. Do you think her intention was a stern talking to?
The idea of painting all men with this brush is plain mysandry btw.
I don’t know her motivation. I do not assume. I just know that two men brutally murdered a child for racist motives and you are trying to make that into women being a systemic problem (because that is what the bear discussion is about. Systemic, socially normalised violence). Wrong turn.
Another edit after your edit: nobody says all men were the same though. You are just trying to imply I would.
I don’t know how clearly I can conditionalize something beyond saying sometimes.
Something you obviously had no issue omitting from your own statement.