I don’t know, I’m not really firm with quantum physics.

Isn’t every parent a trans parent then? You are not assigned parent at birth, you only transition into parenthood by reproducing (a process that also involves multiple hormonal changes).

Well, the Tankies ran similar campaigns in South Korea leading to economic and political consequences.

I am not familiar with that development, can you provide sources for me to read up on it?

I remind you that Tankies promoted MAGA in the USA and AfD in Germany.

Because they have common goals towards Russia, not because Tankies want to continue the marginalisation of women.

Another potential explanation is religious extremist(s) pushing anti-women sentiment.

Could be, could be not. I tend to go with the answer with the least necessary assumptions until further evidence.

The Man or Bear scenario a. is not a narrative, it is a thought experiment and b. does not “paint all men with a broad brush”. It points out how normalised violence against women is in our society. It does not say “all men are violent against women”, that’s just what people who did not (often did not want to) understand the construct read into it.

It does not matter much how you conditionalise your statement when you use a metaphor that is about systemic issues you are implying a similar systemic issue. By choosing the bear you imply she did it because of gendered violence, not racist violence.

I don’t know her motivation. I do not assume. I just know that two men brutally murdered a child for racist motives and you are trying to make that into women being a systemic problem (because that is what the bear discussion is about. Systemic, socially normalised violence). Wrong turn.

Another edit after your edit: nobody says all men were the same though. You are just trying to imply I would.

The violence still came from men. They killed a 14 year old boy. Do you think that’s excusable or what?

I do think it’s all the same person (or maybe two or three).

I simply can’t see a tankie motivation in this behaviour. It does not relate to their ideology (which doesn’t mean tankies cannot be misogynist neckbeards, but at least it is not rooted in their political ideology).

Two grown men according to your article. Encouraged by the Jim Crow-Era social conduct.

Do not try to stir up some misogynist bullshit here. Do not try to relativize racism here. That shit won’t fly here.

No, I think it’s just some Nice Guys™ discovering a new platform.

Trying to twist a racist lynch murderof a 14 year old boy into “muh, women bad” is a choice. A disgusting, despicable choice, but a choice.

You refuse to educate yourself? How unexpected.

That is so reductionist, it isn’t just simplified anymore but flat out false.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory

Scroll down to “academic studies and criticism”.

What is hard to understand about this?

Losing the Plot has nothing to do with competition or loosing or winning?

https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/28244815

Here they tell you “losing the plot” has nothing to do with winning or losing an argument. No reaction from your side. Then I told you, several minutes later, you immediately responded and apologised to them referencing my comment.

Why did you not show the same reaction to them telling you?

Lmao. They told you, too. Why is it you take my comment for this but not theirs?

Calling a random one the internet “kid”. Real class here.

“Losing the plot” has a certain meaning, look it up before you make yourself a fool publicly.

Trolling or harassing in the “I’m just trying to have a debate”-kind of way, making the most absurd, engaging and usually false arguments while maintaining a civil appearance.
The best metaphor I came across would be a DDoS-attack on a human’s topic focus.

Example: when a comment section discusses what could be done so the Mediterranean became less deadly to refugees, a sea lion could stir shit by asking whether it was “really necessary to not have so many people drowning because refugees are raping, stealing and just straining european social security systems anyway? Just asking questions though.”

Or a sea lion could force you into a debate you never wanted. You make a simple statement most people already agree on that doesn’t need much explanation, like “Yeah, fascism is bad, we shouldn’t vote for fascist candidates and parties”, then a sea lion would start to ask you why fascism is bad, what’s so fascist about candidate A, etc, even under other comments you posted stating they were just trying to have a debate, implying you’re dodging them because you had no argument and made everything up.

Doorbell prank.

Klarna is actively incentivising unhealthy spending patterns, employing dark patterns, stuff like that.

It is sexist to reduce women to sex objects. Tgis “would” thing comes out of manosphere-incel corners of the internet.