• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    They keep winning the cases themselves in courts very much rigged in their favor, sure, but for each headline, they risk alienating more gamers who don’t appreciate them bullying comparatively tiny sites who are just providing games that Nintendo themselves refuse to sell.

    • trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Gamers are only capable of remembering these things right up until the next first-party exclusive and new console gets announced. Then, it’s right back to opening their wallets for these fuckers.

      The only way to truly win this fight is for the devs to face potentially life-ruining circumstances to fight it in court. Until then, Nintendo will continue harassing devs and killing the development progress of emulators.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        The only way to truly win this fight is for the devs to face potentially life-ruining circumstances to fight it in court

        So you’re saying we release lions in the courtroom?

        …oh wait, life-RUINING. Hmm… Including their browser histories in discovery?

        I still don’t see how punishing the already victimized helpers is supposed to solve anything…

        • trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Why are you being so obtuse? Yes, the repercussions for losing to Nintendo in court are life-ruining. I said that already.

          However, continuing to let Nintendo DMCA legitimate emulation projects isn’t good in the long-term either and only stalls progress for the targeted projects.

          The only way to “win” this fight is to win in court. I’m not saying that any dev should be compelled against their will to do so. It’s just the only way to actually make progress. This isn’t a technical problem; it’s a legal one.

      • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Maybe some, maybe even most, but as a blanket statement, no.

        I buy games and consoles but haven’t bought an Ubisoft or EA title in a decade. My own personal little boycott against bullshit required launchers may not matter, but I am consistent. I suspect others do the same as well and in aggregate, it might have an impact.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I honestly thought the ads for the new Zelda looked kinda cool, but I’m sworn off them now because of what they did to Garry’s Mod.