• Billegh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would disagree. The idea is great; eliminate preboot malware by trusting the whole boot stack. It has a place in computing and I would like to see it be something easier to work with.

      Pretty much everything about how it’s currently implemented is a mistake, I’ll agree with.

      • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Microsoft has unofficial support for ext4 for their EFI partitions on their azure cloud, which in itself is a violation of their standard.

        • libewa@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          UEFI doesn’t forbid you from implementing additional file systems, it just requires everyone to support UEFI-FAT. iBoot for example supports booting from HFS volumes.

                • libewa@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  You are free to implement any filesystem driver, and either load it in your custom implementation of EFI, or from an EFI image stored on a FAT partition. The EfiFs project provides many drivers under a GPL, including exFAT, Btrfs, ext2-4, NTFS, ISO9660 (cdfs), ZFS and also HFS(+).