• Billegh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would disagree. The idea is great; eliminate preboot malware by trusting the whole boot stack. It has a place in computing and I would like to see it be something easier to work with.

    Pretty much everything about how it’s currently implemented is a mistake, I’ll agree with.

    • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Microsoft has unofficial support for ext4 for their EFI partitions on their azure cloud, which in itself is a violation of their standard.

      • libewa@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        UEFI doesn’t forbid you from implementing additional file systems, it just requires everyone to support UEFI-FAT. iBoot for example supports booting from HFS volumes.

              • libewa@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                41 minutes ago

                You are free to implement any filesystem driver, and either load it in your custom implementation of EFI, or from an EFI image stored on a FAT partition. The EfiFs project provides many drivers under a GPL, including exFAT, Btrfs, ext2-4, NTFS, ISO9660 (cdfs), ZFS and also HFS(+).