• stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Because we need the baseload, even a huge wind or solar farm can provide the stable baseload.

    In my first comment, I suggested that we would build a facility large enough to handle global nuclear waste.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      yeah, I get it, you’re whole hog on it, the enthusiasm comes through loud and clear.

      I don’t agree, but there’s no amount of sense that’s going to sway the already decided.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          nothing, not a single thing you’ve argued, will in any way reduce the radioactive leftovers nuclear reactors produce and most of the world is putting off for the next generation to fix.

          Like climate change.

          How many crises do you think those poor kids are going to be able to manage at once?