• MangoCats@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    So, is it easier to change the behavior of 3500 people who can do whatever they want, 340 million people most of whom have some choices in their lifestyle, or 1.4 billion people of whom about half are just doing what it takes to survive?

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      “Easy” is irrelevant. The climate doesn’t care about which is easier.

      The simple fact is that China accounts for 1/3 of total global emissions. If the US went completely carbon neutral today, global emissions would be cut from 38.6 Billion tons to… 33.7 Billion tons.

      If China went completely carbon neutral we’d drop from 38.6 Billion tons to 26.3 Billion.

      Everyone needs to cut their emissions. China is actively doing the most damage to the climate, however.

      • Womble@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        If Elon musk contributed 90% as much as all of Germany would you be equally happy saying Germany’s 80 million people held more responsibility than Musk for their emissions? Per capita is the only measure that makes sense as it is how much each person is contributing.

        Another way of looking at it, Yunnan creates far less CO2 than the USA so by your logic the USA is worse than it. Repeat for every other Chinese province.