• qqq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This is such a wild take to be getting this many upvotes. If nothing happened in LLM development from this day forward they’d still be absurdly dangerous: both in an information security context and a social engineering context.

    Lemmy is absolutely head in the sand about LLMs and it is wild. You can dislike LLMs and acknowledge their capabilities [and limitations] at the same time.

      • qqq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 hours ago

        LLMs entering the world have revealed two very different types of crazies and I’m starting to think they’re everywhere. It’s quite tiring to have to constantly say “no they’re not useless” and “no they’re not super god” instead of engage with an actually interesting discussion.

        • darvocet@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I don’t really understand why lemmy thinks what it thinks on this one. To me it’s undeniable that it’s improving fast and it’s capable today of replacing a great many current job roles. Putting our heads in the sand isn’t going to make it go away.