Mustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.club to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 hours agoBernie Sanders proposes 20 year prison sentence for AI devs who plow ahead with Artificial Superintelligence plans - penalty on par with illegally developing rogue nuclear weaponswww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square116linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkBernie Sanders proposes 20 year prison sentence for AI devs who plow ahead with Artificial Superintelligence plans - penalty on par with illegally developing rogue nuclear weaponswww.tomshardware.comMustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.club to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square116linkfedilink
minus-squareCommunist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-29 hours agoIt can perform necessary tasks that actually drive intelligence and isn’t derivative. See: those proofs. You’re essentially arguing that it’s useless and just moves data around, this isn’t true. You’re a little too caught up on that specific wording.
minus-squarekn0wmad1c@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 hours agoI never said or implied that it’s useless. You’re deriving meaning where there is none. It’s a tool and tools are always useful. Here’s an example of a supercomputer (not AI) designed to solve unresolved mathematical equations and scientific problems Same idea, doesn’t need AI to do it. My point was, and is, that it cannot replicate human intelligence and that it doesn’t have intelligence on its own.
minus-squareCommunist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 hours agoGive an example of a problem a human can solve that an llm could not, then.
It can perform necessary tasks that actually drive intelligence and isn’t derivative. See: those proofs.
You’re essentially arguing that it’s useless and just moves data around, this isn’t true.
You’re a little too caught up on that specific wording.
I never said or implied that it’s useless. You’re deriving meaning where there is none. It’s a tool and tools are always useful. Here’s an example of a supercomputer (not AI) designed to solve unresolved mathematical equations and scientific problems
Same idea, doesn’t need AI to do it.
My point was, and is, that it cannot replicate human intelligence and that it doesn’t have intelligence on its own.
Give an example of a problem a human can solve that an llm could not, then.