• stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That is exactly what I wrote, I pointed out that the the rules defined for the AI/LLM has to be external of the AI/LLM, like a network firewall but more sophisticated.

      • richmondez@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It’s not exactly what you wrote, you only explicitly wrote it doesn’t follow unwritten rules. I think we are both being pedantic over the basic premise though, LLM output dumb.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Fair point!

          I am glad we both see the extreme caution we need to treat AI/LLMs with.

          Wait, I just think I figured something out…

          What is the deterrent for humans to not break rules?

          We don’t want the consequences that would impart.

          An AI or LLM is not advanced enough to understand consequences these days, so they don’t matter, other than to act as an input to compose a suitable reply according to the LLM.

          I have known this logically for a long time, but this is the first time I made the actual intellectual connection and actually understood cause and effect.

          Probably old news, but having a moment of realization like this is always fun and interesting.