Forester@yiffit.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agorollin' coalyiffit.netimagemessage-square150fedilinkarrow-up1586arrow-down144
arrow-up1542arrow-down1imagerollin' coalyiffit.netForester@yiffit.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square150fedilink
minus-squareNegativeInf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down3·2 years agoBoth have a storage problem. But coal has a destroys the atmosphere problem. So, yes, trade-offs.
minus-squaredeegeese@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down11·2 years agoYou’re moving the goalposts after they debunked the first claim.
minus-square9bananas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·2 years ago“debunking” requires a source… otherwise they just put forth a claim
Both have a storage problem. But coal has a destroys the atmosphere problem. So, yes, trade-offs.
You’re moving the goalposts after they debunked the first claim.
“debunking” requires a source… otherwise they just put forth a claim