• tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve felt I should walk away since I heard his views on GPLv2 vs GPLv3… and his infamous lack of compassion when communicating with others.

    I’m interested using GNU Hurd as an alternative to Linux, eventually.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        "Torvalds is known for vocally disagreeing with other developers on the Linux kernel mailing list. Calling himself a “really unpleasant person”, he explained, “I’d like to be a nice person and curse less and encourage people to grow rather than telling them they are idiots. I’m sorry—I tried, it’s just not in me.” - Wikipedia

  • Armand1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I realize that some people really dislike AI, but this is an area where I’m willing to absolutely put my foot down as the top-level maintainer. Linux is not one of those anti-AI projects, and if somebody has issues with that, they can do the open-source thing and fork it. Or just walk away. AI is a tool, just like other tools we use. And it’s clearly a useful one.

    I think broadly speaking what he says is reasonable. If you don’t want to use AI, then don’t, but I think it can be used somewhat responsibly.

    I have all sorts of issues with AI tooling:

    • the centralization of power
    • the load it adds on maintainers because of the amount of slop bad developers (and non-devs) produce with it
    • the environmental impacts of using larger models
    • the data centers causing health risks
    • the impact on the PC industry
    • the degeneration of skills and knowledge.

    That said, it’s a tool, and can be used to amplify good work too.