• 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      The main reason is that it is completely controlled by Canonical, with no way to add alternative repos.

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          You can, but that completely negates the reasons why you’d want to have a repo system in the first place. You gotta do the legwork to get updates, for example.

          • JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            This isn’t necessarily true - a developer choosing to not include their app in a repo can always opt for a self-updating mechanism.

            Don’t get me wrong - repos and tooling to manage all of your apps at once are preferred. But if a developer or user wants to avoid the Canonical controlled repo, I’m just pointing out there are technically ways to do that.

            If you’d question why someone would use snap at all at that point… that would be a good question. The point is just that they can, if they want to.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      For computer idiots it’s not bad at all. It mostly just works if you don’t mess with it and Canonical relies on it to ship software for Ubuntu. It’s one of those you should know what you’re doing situations if you’re using standard Ubuntu and messing with it. If you remove it, you will have to figure out what’s shipped via snap and how to supplant it if you want it working, among other potential headaches.