Agree, but my point was that Bernie do know it’s unrealistic and illegal, so he must expect it either be shot down outright in which case it’s just a theatre or be negotiated to be legal (“just compensation”) in which case it’s a bailout for tech giants in the height of bubble.
I don’t know which is correct, but in either case Bernie comes out of it as unprincipled in best case and bootlicker in the worst.
Don’t also forget who killed her. Wer hat uns verraten? – Sozialdemokraten!
Edit: If the downvoters want to tell me where I’m wrong, I’d be glad to be corrected.
Fifth amendment to the constitution states: “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation” meaning this proposition is straight up unconstitutional unless they amend it to pay. And i assume Bernie do know constitution of his own country so i have no clue how he proposed it like this unless it is to stir a shitstorm about “seizing” and then amend it as “compromise”.
We the people
“The people” they meant: 
Yeah this makes it even more obvious that this is the preemptive bail proposition, paying 50% of the inflated bubble prices then when the bubble pops end up with nothing. Prime example of privatising the gains, socialising the costs.
any army which does not train to use all the weapons, all the means and methods of warfare that the enemy possesses, or may possess, is behaving in an unwise or even criminal manner. This applies to politics even more than it does to the art of war.
Lenin, Left-Wing Communism: An Infantile Disorder (1920)
You started nitpicking entirely unrelated topic, seems that some AI live rent free in your brain. And now you’re tripling down.
For someone so hellbent on inquisitioning people for AI heresy you sure are bad at it. It’s a model released in 2005, which you could also easily check in ok, maybe 20 seconds, but you just doubled down.
It wasn’t, stop lying, your original post in this thread was this, you didn’t even bothered to edit it:
Meme don’t necessarily need to be funny. Though of course most of them are made for that purpose.
Uwolnić kitku
Chechenya was more complicated but essentially it boiled to being prototype ISIS pseudostate which destabilised entire region and Chechens themselves weren’t monolithic on this, Russia fucked it up at first by trying to do it American way while not being America, but what did you expect of Yeltsin.
Georgia was actually incredibly similar to Ukraine, it started when Georgian comprador government attempted to ethnically cleanse Ossetians. The difference was that Georgian govt was more traditional US comprador instead of full nazis like in Ukraine and backed down after Russia shown they are willing to make a military confrontation out of it. And note that Russia did not even invaded Georgia just enforced back to the status quo which is autonomy and de facto independence of South Ossetia from Georgia, which i think is more than restrained in the face of ethnic cleansing.
34 victims in just a single comment
TWO OTHER FAMINES THAT HAPPENED THE SAME YEAR
It’s also exceptionally bad faith to treat it as three famines while it was a single one occuring on huge areas. But once we learn it, the entire “holodomor” narration shatter immediately.
I didn’t even meant to argue, just wanted to put it into perspective for lurkers. We could even go further and note that there is huge support for genocide in various forms and methods in Israel, but Zelensky got explicitly elected on his promises of deescalating and stopping the civil war.
Ukraine being less democratic than Israel is not the gotcha its supporters expected
In this case it might actually matter because it straight up defend billionaires property here. Remember how in “Democracy for the Few” Parenti agrumented that US system do appear to be completely paralysed in case of proposals working for the people, but works like well oiled machine when it comes for the ruling class interest.