안녕하세요!
There’s a lot of problems with Wikipedia, but in my years editing there (I’m extended protected rank), I’ve come to terms that it’s about as good as it can be.
In all but one edit war, the better sourced team came out on top. Source quality discussion is also quite good. There’s a problem with from positive/negative tone in articles, and sometimes articles get away with bad sourcing before someone can correct it, but this is about as good as any information hub can get.
Right, because side-loading is called “installing” on Linux
Larry Tesler, inventor of the cut, copy, and paste commands, dies at 74
It’s still around, and it still sucks: https://nuclearplayer.com/
But the Dems don’t (checks notes…) celebrate deporting illegal immigrants! I’m sure the people getting bombed in the middle east know that’s where the line is drawn! They think I’m a good guy for supporting Democrats, right???
What’s worse, bombing the middle east, or calling the Democrats out for bombing the middle east?
Nah, not for suicide:
But in the post warning users that the company will call the authorities if they seem like they’re going to hurt someone, OpenAI also acknowledged that it is “currently not referring self-harm cases to law enforcement to respect people’s privacy given the uniquely private nature of ChatGPT interactions.”
Proton upstreams to Wine a lot. You can tell by the number of patches they have keeps fluctuating
Distro? No. Wayland? Yes…
I read most this article and don’t see how any of it is false or misinformation. Literally the first word in the page is “alleged”, and it’s full of arguments with linked citations from both sides
Wait, how is you providing evidence to back up your argument “doing work for others”?
JK we all know the answer … 🤡
Link or gtfo, let people check the sources themselves
Why wouldn’t they default to not accepting any AI generated content
If you can accurately detect what content is AI generated, you’ll have a company worth billions overnight
You don’t need to go to the hospital for a sprained ankle
No, in this case autopilot never disengaged (but according to the article, it should have issued the warning and disengaged earlier)
Rare Australia W
There’s a lot of really bad slop on YouTube. Your algorithm might be curated to “documentaries”, but that’s far from the norm
Putting a title on it (I.e. “Big beautiful bill”) doesn’t mean it is a big, beautiful bill.
I’m not skeptical of DEI because I’m against “diversity, equity, and inclusion”, I’m skeptical because of piss poor implementations of it I see in the workforce
It was about whether Bitcoin Cash was referred to as “Bcash” or not.
I forget the semantics, but there were a lot of sources calling it Bcash, but then there were equally reliable sources saying that was only the name given by detractors. The war was something about how Bcash should be referenced in the opening paragraph