• phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s lthe only one I’d use but…

      It really is lacking basic functionality. Hell, o can’t even order torrents that are currently running by size or % done, which would be really helpful if it existed

      Also, I don’t think it’s actively developed anymore, I haven’t seen an update in its functionality in at least 5 years, maybe even 10

  • GenBlob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have seen this same image circulated for years. We need a new one because transmission in D tier is unacceptable.

    • elscallr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah “it does nothing but downloads torrents” is the selling point. It’s the reason I exclusively use Transmission.

    • FartsUnited@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Transmission used to be my preferred app hands down but recent updates have negatively impacted its performance on my end. If all it needs to do is download torrents, why does it now sometimes seem incapable of connecting to a given (popular) swarm ?

      Particularly unfortunate is that once it does connect, the download speed has now become arbitrary: it keeps alternating between ‘incredibly fast’ and ‘surprisingly slow’ and takes three or four times as long to complete. I’ve become so exasperated with it that I’ve been forced to move on (deluge instantly connects and consistently downloads at five times the speed).

  • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whoever designed that seems like they have something against transmission lol.

    For me personally: it gets the job done, is allowed by most private trackers, fast and responsive, has a functional webui, and a very vast selection of third party apps (in addition to the cross platform first-party offering)

    It’s simplicity is kind of its selling point. Only real criticism I have is that it’s unfortunate some of the supported features aren’t accessible in the first party apps, and especially from the lightweight web interface

    • millie@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’ve used qbittorrent, deluge, utorrent, and a number of other clients over the years. I greatly prefer transmission. I don’t need my torrent client to do anything but download and seed.

      I bet this person hates GIMP too.

    • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      And Qbit also has network binding, which is the single most important feature for me as a VPN user.

    • garyyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, seems weird that simple “it downloads torrents” client gets a D. It gets the job done, is easy to figure out, and doesnt fuck about with features I would never touch. Maybe thats not enough for a power user but for me its exactly what I want.

      (but then why is Tixati in B, seems to have mostly downsides?)

    • investorsexchange@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use transmission because I can install it from Ubuntu repos and it runs from the command line in Ubuntu server.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dropped Transmission because I found it had severe performance problems with very large torrents. qBittorrent has been great.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Neither did I until I tried running torrents > 100GB.

          There was some bug in the way it was using Java’s non-blocking IO and buffer classes that caused resource starvation with very large torrents.

    • dai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep my other packages manage everything else, transmission is rarely logged into on the GUI side. KISS

    • uranibaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just the option to not have the new torrent dialog pop up every time is reason enough for me. And just proper sorting. And quick content overview.

  • callyral [he/they]@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I like Transmission, it’s minimal and downloads torrents.

    May I also mention aria2? I don’t think it counts as a torrent client but it supports torrenting.

  • Tau@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Transmission as a server is very good and lightweight, specially if you pair it with something like Flood and the *arr apps

  • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Transmission does have network binding. At least, i’m pretty sure it does. At least on Linux. It also has a cli interface and is a “full” client so it should at least be on par with rTorrent in that sense. It’s not a great cli interface but it works.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Used qBittorrent for a long time now. No complaints. Ever since I’ve set up a home server, I almost exclusively use qBittorrent-nox now. Its qBittorrent, but headless! Runs all the time. Just use a web ui to access it. I can even run a reverse proxy and access it from afar!

  • artaxadepressedhorse@lemmyngs.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll never understand the FOSS mentality of “There’s already a quality project out there with active development and most of the user-share. Perfect, so I’ll utilize my off-time to create my own inferior competitor and fragment the users instead of contribute to the existing one”.

    I mean, I get it if the existing project maintainers start acting with shady interests - the threat of the fork can be a powerful tool. But it seems like many of these alt projects do it right out of the gate. Meanwhile, it took linux desktop how long to get a functional wifi driver out of the box??

    • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Likely what happens is that while the existing options are fine for the masses, a power user has a specific use case that is not covered by said options, so they create their own program to fit their specific needs. Eventually this new program evolves into something that is also useful to the masses, and that’s how we get to where we are now with several good FOSS options.

    • sanzky@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of it is just difference in vision. FOSS projects often have an owner and they might not be open to switch the direction of their project or be willing to maintain a large feature that someone wants to contribute.

      there is also the “I rewrote it using Rust/Go/whatever because that makes it better” people.

  • parallax@local106.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Welp, the lesson I have learned from this thread is that I should feel fine with transmission in my container set lol

  • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is out of date and Deluge is S tier.

    It was rewritten and 2.0 came out in 2022 to address the slowdown issues when seeding a thousand plus torrents

  • sleisl@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use rtorrent+rutorrent for a web UI, and it’s starting to show its age…

    Is there anything else out there that can handle 10,000+ torrents? I seed a lot of ebooks 🤓

    • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Zero issues with Transmission. I seed way more than that. Putting it so low really indicates who put together this chart. Definitely an Ubuntu GUI-only user.

      Torrent client is supposed to handle torrents. Transmission isn’t lagging behind on any protocol features. All the other (very optional) features are trivially handled by docker/podman.

      • sanzky@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I run it headless in a small pc in my basement that I use as server. it also has an http api so other systems can integrate with it (eg another program that looks for torrents and pushes the torrents into it.

    • davidisgreat@lemmy.sedimentarymountains.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I run Transmission on a VM that is permanently connected to a VPN. It dumps the completed files on an NFS share. I’m open to trying something different. Transmission seems like the best option.

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    You forgot to include Tribler. Since it has some tor-like privacy features, it beats all of the mentioned ones.