• Newhere@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    17 hours ago

    There was all good,just the government was always right. So,if person kept low profile,lived his life,didn’t spoke against the president, he could live life working and nit bothering about tomorrow. Roof over head, some food always available. Free med care,education, ect. It was very suitable for normies, lazy people were made work, and the smart ones… eh,those suffered in Russia…

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I don’t like the implication that workers are unintelligent, lazy, “Normie’s,” while rentiers, capitalists, etc. are “smart people.”

      • Newhere@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Your comprehension of text is outstanding, but please, try to read again and point were I said that normies were lazy or not intelligent? Where I am saying that capitalist are smart? If not minding , I will ask you personal question- what is your direct experience with Russia?

        • 挂路灯人@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Considering the conversation is about the USSR and not Russia (in its modern form) then everyone on this site likely has the same personal anecdotal experience of roughly 0 and is instead working off data and stories they’ve been told. (Apologies if any senior citizens happen to be lurking Lemmy I just don’t think it’s likely).

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Under the soviet union, the large majority of those who benefited were the working classes, while those who lost out were the formerly owning classes. You don’t directly reference them by their classes, you indirectly do by describing those who won and those who lost accordingly.

    • Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      14 hours ago

      In my experience with “smart” people from former Eastern Bloc countries now living in the West, what they “suffered” from was the idea that they didn’t get to live a life of significantly higher material comforts than “normal” workers in their country, similar to how things were in the West.

      • Newhere@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        But isn’t it funny how nowadays working normals in USA struggling with same, didn’t you noticed that ? Or they are living dream life on edge of bankruptcy. Dave Ramsey speaks OnLive with many regular working class Americans about this "suffering " and proposing ussr lifestyle 🤣🤣 Omg, the point is to see ALL this capitalism/socializm as brokoli and carrots swimming in same soup and people arguing till blood to prove that one is poison and another is antidote while eating the soup. People are played around, fooled to involve them in debating and spending their time and energy on this , while Teo fights, tge third wins… P.s. been on both sides of world , lived both regimes, now living peacefully and just enjoying shitshows here in comments…

    • folaht@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Ah yes, the “smart” ones.
      Stable geniuses, and very high IQ, always having had a very high IQ, according to many people.
      And with very strong instincts, more important than any degree in a university.
      Always known how to make the right moves in business.
      You know, the ones people say about that they’re geniuses, and they don’t disagree with them because they’ve been building empires from the ground up.