Quick Introduction We have all been on forums, chats, reddit, discord, youtube, or somewhere and heard “Oh! Model XYZ is AMAZEBALLZ!zomgwtfbbq” then downloaded it (or more likely, some quantized form of it) and said “eww… This sucks!” This post is going to be a rather technical series of experiments to demonstrate the impact of implementation-specific hazards with inference. I will be using the term “reference implementation” to describe the lab that published and offers first-party hosting of ...
Sentience is roughly defined as “Line in the sand between humans and things we are allowed to eat”.
It’s a concept created to justify treating animals differently than humans in a world where the old justification (“You can eat animals because God said so”) isn’t applicable anymore.
Since the concept is defined backwards to justify preexisting actions, it doesn’t have any actually solid definition, and whether something’s sentient or not depends pretty much entirely on the opinion of the person deciding it.
This is correct
Would you also like a link to the English dictionary?
Because it’s nowhere near correct
I am starting to think you’re sponsored by Merriam-Webster
Perhaps I should seek a sponsorship with all of the mentions this thread has necessitated. Unfortunately I’m not currently on the payroll (or formerly for that matter, lol).
I don’t think you have the cognitive requirements to understand why your dictionary definitions are completely irrelevant here
My man, allow me to introduce you to the dictionary:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sentience
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sentient
Did you ask your AI what the definition of “sentience” was or something? Because something/someone is hallucinating.