A new Coddy Developer Survey found that four in five developers, 80%, say their use of AI has felt more like a dependence than an advantage.

  • Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Ypu have no idea what youre talking about. They absolutely have access to “information”

    • kescusay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      No, they really don’t. That’s not how they work. At least, not if the “information” you’re talking about is real semantic content that real minds can process.

      Every piece of information you think an LLM has access to is actually just converted into a stream of additional tokens that are fed into the model to (hopefully usefully) modify the next tokens it predicts. That’s not the same thing as having actual access to information. Tokens are just numbers with statistically more (or less) likely relationships to each other.

      I’m not trying to downplay LLMs. They’re architecturally interesting and have genuine uses. I’m just trying to head off a bit of technical inaccuracy.

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Absolutely correct and well said. Until you give it a tool to call a websearch (in my case SearxNG), I occasionally break it out (local 27B model) when a search is pulling lots of AI slop, Spy vs Spy style. I make it give me references and it usually indicates a bad search (XY problem)

    • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      LLMs don’t. There are tools that can fetch new information and then gets fed into the model as more tokens, but that’s just a special case of what kescusay is saying about injecting text.