• ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    A handful in the sky is still a lot less useful than the thousands on the ground. We need them off the streets and then we can deal with the drones.

    • Chulk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      While I agree that the street-level cameras should urgently be taken care of, don’t underestimate what a stationary aerial drone can do over a couple of hours.

      Listen to Radiolab’s Eye in the Sky episode. Think of the possibilities that have opened up because of drone tech in the 10 years since it first aired (and the 20 years since the tech was used in Iraq). It’s truly frightening what these drones will be able to accomplish once they are in place.

    • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I don’t think sending a couple drones to canvas a city grid from the sky would count as less useful. In fact, it’d be a lot faster than strapping a camera to a truck/car. Really depends how they are used. But worst case scenario, both drones and fixed cameras work in conjunction, which they obviously would.