inari@piefed.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-212 hours agoDon't paste the AI.dontpastetheai.comexternal-linkmessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1355arrow-down131
arrow-up1324arrow-down1external-linkDon't paste the AI.dontpastetheai.cominari@piefed.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-212 hours agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squaredraco_aeneus@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39·11 hours agoWhat really seals it is the ‘angry’ version, which is just the same message again but with different formatting. No human would label that as “the angry version” without the inclusion of at least one “fucking”.
minus-squareFlames5123@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 hours agoIt says “but for fucks sake” in the angry version though.
minus-squaredraco_aeneus@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·36 minutes agoOh yeah, you’re right, there is a swear in it! I do still feel it’s extremely tame for being an “angry” voice though. For comparison, this is what a human sounds like when ranting about a topic they care about.
What really seals it is the ‘angry’ version, which is just the same message again but with different formatting. No human would label that as “the angry version” without the inclusion of at least one “fucking”.
It says “but for fucks sake” in the angry version though.
Oh yeah, you’re right, there is a swear in it! I do still feel it’s extremely tame for being an “angry” voice though. For comparison, this is what a human sounds like when ranting about a topic they care about.