• Rothe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    They are the same. AI companies are using excess energy powered by fossil fuels for no reason at all. We don’t need it. If they were using renewable energy then they would be taking renewable energy from projects that are much more important for our daily survival.

    All energy consumed by AI is energy we could have spend for something actual useful. That they are using fossil fuels just underlines what a mountain of “fuck you” to humanity the entire AI project is. It exists solely to provide more billions for billionaires and no other reason.

    • r1veRRR@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      Same is true for meat. Meat is to nutrition what AI is to intelligence. An extremely wasteful, ultimately unnecessary version with better alternatives.

      The main difference for all the complainers is of course that they already don’t use AI. Not using meat would, in contrast, require actual effort beyond moaning and bitching.

      If your morals depend on whether it requires personal effort, you’re not moral, you’re a hypocrite.

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      If they were using renewable energy then they would be taking renewable energy from projects that are much more important for our daily survival.

      Exactly … the problem with AI is that it’s wasting energy.

      Then there is another problem, which is that a lot of our energy comes from sources that cause pollution.

      The wasting of energy would not be that significant of a problem if enough clean energy was available. They are not the same. Just related.