“By partnering with vetted United States companies subject to the direction and oversight of the Federal Government, we will enhance our ability to counter [transnational criminal organizations’] threats and combat transnational cybercrime, fraud, and other predatory schemes against American citizens,” the memo said.
I mean, I’m happy to take a gentleman’s bet that this will be a net good. I agree it depends on implementation, and we’ll see what that looks like. Honestly, the realist interpretation is that 5yrs from now it’s tied up in the courts and has gone nowhere. That’s really the most likely outcome.
I brought up birtherism as an example of obvious nonsense that Obama handled in the right way by not engaging with. I, in fact, brought it up because it obviously had no truth, and the fact that you could read what I said in any other way speaks to either intentional bad faith or exceptionally poor reading comprehension. My point was that McConnell was following Obama’s lead in not engaging with conspiracy theories, as it only hurts to do so.
You keep not engaging with the example good thing I gave. Again pointing to bad faith engagement with my argument. The example “good thing” is raising the wages of federal employees. That is good. That has been my one example of a good thing. You say experts disagree with me? Find one expert saying that raising the federal pay scale was bad.
I said that the new cyber EO could be good, depending on implementation, but that I’m tentatively hopeful.
And everything in the bottom of your post is about cyber warfare, which is wholly irrelevant to the conversation at hand by any metric. The military should not be going after scammers. The military is not for hunting criminals. The war in Iran has nothing to do with scamming grandmas. These are completely separate parts of the government that have nothing to do with one another. This is an FBI program to hire cyber bounty hunters.
And I’m not saying private industry is inherently better. The government just has trouble hiring technical experts across the board because the governmental pay scale is very rigid. Top cyber experts can easily charge $250k+/yr. What GS level do you offer to make it where you hire competent people? There isn’t one that matches industry. If you are a government employee you are on a G scale (or are an executive level appointee), no exceptions. The government doesn’t have the flexibility to pay experts enough to fill these roles.
Would I welcome a sweeping change that allows the government more flexibility in how much they pay people? Absolutely. But that’s a major overhaul of how federal employment works writ large. The current solution is butts in seats contractors who work for private companies doing the work. That’s happening now. This is just an extension of that.
Yes, let’s check back in a couple of years on this one as there is no reason to go round and round when the reality is we both have our differing opinions.
I agree the most likely outcome will be court action when companies begin engaging in open cyberwarfare with each other under the pretense of stopping criminal activity. The US is not new when it comes to industrial espionage and by sanctioning this behavior this administration is opening the door wider to a dystopian future.
Obviously this process will become corrupted right away as the safe guards on private corporations are non-existent compared to the military regardless of any claims made by this administration. This administration has already shown time and time again they will use corruption to control the legal system (see charging people for vandalism when the job was botched, see going after colleges under the guise of civil rights, see going after US officials for nonsense crimes, see going after our constitutional rights with executive orders, see pardoning allies thus circumventing our legal system for profit).
Birtherism is not even close to the same thing and I find it insulting you continue to pussyfoot around with it. The fact that Obama ignored an obviously false and racist attack isn’t in the same realm of Mconnell hiding his medical condition from his constituents and failing to do his job. Frankly, I don’t know where the fuck you are trying to go with this. If he came clean with the truth it would end this charade. This is in no way what Obama dealt with.
You fail to see the connection of Trump purposely destroying our countries ability to fight cyber terrorism and then trying to privatize it for profit. I am beginning to see you are being purposely obtuse. Hand waving the facts because they don’t fit your seemingly naive interpretation of what is going on is disingenuous.
I won’t engage with your silly game of cherry picking what Trump as done. Why? Because it is garbage as Trump has done just the opposite.
https://www.americanprogress.org/article/trump-just-cut-the-minimum-wage-for-hundreds-of-thousands-of-private-sector-workers/
https://www.epi.org/blog/trumps-blatant-attack-on-workers-you-may-not-have-heard-about-cutting-the-wages-of-nearly-half-a-million-workers/
https://www.govexec.com/pay-benefits/2026/08/state-play-around-2027-pay-raise/415269/
Why was his recent raise bad?
https://www.factcheck.org/2025/10/trumps-false-claims-about-military-pay-raises-and-recruitment/
Well first of all it isn’t all federal employees. In fact, he gave them paltry 1% and is planning on doing similarly in 2027. Even more damning is this is actually following a preordained increase formula. Biden gave 4.6%, 5.2% and 4.5% in 2023, 2024 and 2025.
I am at a loss with you and I do think everyone is correct in down voting you. Having said that, you are not a completely unreasonable person. I appreciate that.
Agreed that we largely probably aren’t going to come to an agreement as we just have fundamentally different opinions on this.
I do think your first point here about this enabling corporate espionage is a bit nonsensical. That’s so far afield as to be borderline unrelated. It’s very “if we let gay people get married what’s next? People marrying horses???” Like, it doesn’t make sense on its face. (And to be clear, so that I’m not misinterpreted again. I’m not saying that gay marriage is bad because then people would marry horses. I am again using this as a parallel example to the point you made, as it makes just as much sense.)
Vis-a-vis birtherism. Do you know how many people I had tell me that, “if Obama was actually a citizen, all he would have to do is share his long form birth certificate. The fact that he won’t do that one tiny simple thing is clear evidence that it doesn’t exist. The fact that you can’t see that is absolutely asinine, and the only reason I think you might deny it is that you are being willfully obtuse and arguing in bad faith.”? It was a lot. I’m from a red area. There are a lot of morons. But you can see how that maybe has some parallels to the people who are saying, “all he has to do to prove he’s not dead is share a photo (oh, wait, he did, it’s probably shopped)… I mean video, yeah, that’s what I said. And the fact that he doesn’t put out a response to every moved goalpost is a clear indication he’s actually a corpse.”
For the last part, I will say, you’re conflating a lot of things here that aren’t the same. It’s a very shallow understanding of how the cyber field works. It’s like saying “Trump gutted the Navy’s budget, and now people wonder why they’re not able to catch any murders in Miami? Come on! Don’t you see how these are related?” Yeah, I mean, they are both related to use of force. They are both kind of water related. But they really don’t have anything to do with one another.
Our country doesn’t have any capability right now to fight online scammers. We have military cyber. We have DoD cyber personnel. But that isn’t their mission set. They aren’t working it. FBI cyber is the closest thing we have to this, and they are woefully unequipped to go after international organized cyber crime. They deal more with online drug and CSAM trafficking. We need to address this issue.
And as I say, recruitment drives to bring in cyber professionals as government employees have failed miserably. The government can’t pay enough, and there’s no real way to fix that.
My cherry pick was federal (non-military) employees. Which he raised by 4.6%, in line with Biden. The first three links you picked were about private sector workers, which as nothing to do with the EO in question. The last is for military personnel, who are handled differently. But the raise for federal employees was a good thing. Just like it was a good thing every time Biden did it. He could have chosen to say eff’em, and not given them their raise, but he didn’t. And that’s a good thing. All the links you posted I fully agree are bad things. But unrelated bad things.
My point (to reiterate for the 50th time) isn’t that he is good or does good things generally. Just that if you kneejerk react with “that’s a bad thing,” even when he’s just doing things that are traditionally viewed as good under better leadership, then you’re just playing team sport politics, not actually paying attention to the reality of what’s going on. And if someone’s not paying attention, it’s hard to take them seriously.
ETA: You also seem reasonable. I think you may be a bit in the tribalism weeds, but I appreciate that you’re willing to engage. As for down votes, I looked back through and I’m pretty even. My worst spread is on the first post at +4/-13, which isn’t too bad. Especially when I’m taking a stance that goes against the group think. I’m not sad about it. I’ve got plenty of net positive comments elsewhere to balance it out, lol.